An audience is not a community.

I've been thinking a lot about the difference between bringing people together and creating a community among them. Perhaps because this confusion appears all the time around us: WhatsApp groups, events, contact lists, clubs, brand communities. We put a lot of people in the same environment and conclude that a community has been born.

But perhaps this question is even more interesting to those who lead. Because leading, most of the time, means occupying the center stage. It means being the person who speaks, who is looked at, who needs to have a ready answer. And there's a weariness in that that we rarely name, the weariness of always being in the audience and rarely in the community.

A recent scene helped me see this more clearly. I went to a dinner where the host had gathered a small group of people to hear a guest talk about some ideas he advocates.

At a certain point in the evening, the guest arrived. He was introduced, spoke about his beliefs, answered questions, greeted people, and after some time, left. Everything happened as it should. There was a room full of interesting people, with stories, experience, and the ability to make things happen. There was attention, access, influence. But when he left, I was left with the feeling that little had been built between him and those people.

There was a hearing. Not necessarily a connection.

Dinner continued...

Gradually, some people left, and a smaller group ended up staying, without introductions, without anyone trying to convince the others of anything, without an agenda to follow. The host himself stayed with us, and what should have been just the end of a dinner stretched into the night and into the early hours of the morning.

We started talking. Someone told part of their own story, another shared something they were going through, we talked about business, family, pets, choices, difficulties, things that probably wouldn't come up in a first introduction.

There were questions, laughter, genuine interest in who was there, not in what each person represented.

For the first time that night, no one was looking at just one person. We were all, finally, looking at each other. Perhaps that's exactly what we miss without knowing how to name it.

Is proximity the same thing as a bond?

Perhaps one of the great confusions of our time is calling an audience a community. An audience functions in a relatively simple way: someone occupies the center and the others pay attention.

Community works differently.

In it, people don't just relate to those at the center; they begin to recognize themselves in each other. And that changes everything, including for those who lead.

And what has been the topic of conversation when people meet you?

If you're usually the one occupying that central role, it might be worth asking yourself this question. I'm not talking about work. I'm talking about having people around you who see you as a person before they see you as a leader. About the impact that's caused when they leave a conversation with you. Obviously, sometimes we'll organize meetings just to "chat," but what we're creating, in a way, is a safe environment for that particular group of people to feel more and more comfortable each day and have a point of reference for what is being cultivated.

An audience is very dependent on who is on stage. When that person leaves, the experience almost always ends with them. A community can continue when the person who brought people together stops leading the conversation.

Perhaps one of the best signs that a community is being born is precisely this: when relationships no longer depend on who originally brought everyone together.

Is there a community, or is there only encouragement?

Perhaps that's why so many initiatives called communities are, in practice, merely distribution channels. The group exists as long as there is content, the event functions as long as there is programming, and people show up as long as there is some clear benefit.

Simply removing the stimulus allows us to see if there is anything else beyond it.

Building a real community takes time.

repetition,

coexistence,

shared memory,

Enough space for people to stop being just contacts.

And perhaps there is a particularly important question for those who wish to build brands, movements, or networks of relationships.

We usually start by asking "how do I activate these people?".

Perhaps we should start a little earlier: "what relationship exists here before I need something from them?".

What kind of community exists around you, for you?

That night, the moment that stayed with me the most happened after the performance ended, when most people had already left and the owner of the house, who could have simply called it a night, decided to stay. We stayed talking until the early hours of the morning.

Perhaps the difference between the two moments of the same night lies precisely there. While someone occupies the center of attention, people look at that person. When no one else occupies the center of attention and the conversation continues in the same way, it's because something had already begun to exist between them.

If you lead something, it might be worth asking not only what kind of community you are building for your business, but also what kind of community exists around you for you.

A place where, from time to time, nobody needs to be the center of attention. Not even you.

Keep reading

Strategy also means choosing where not to be.

Every forest begins with a tree.